4.8 Article

Exploring the Influence of Inter- and Intra-crystal Diversity of Surface Barriers in Zeolites on Mass Transport by Using Super-Resolution Microimaging of Time-Resolved Guest Profiles

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202203903

关键词

Guest Molecules; Mass Transfer; Structured Illumination Microscopy; Surface Barriers; Zeolites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21991093]
  2. Innovation program of science and research from Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics [DICP I201938]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the molecular transport in single zeolite crystals using super-resolution structured illumination microscopy. The diffusion behaviors on the center and surface planes of the crystals were used to monitor the diversity of surface barriers. This provides a new perspective for studying the molecular transport mechanisms and origins of surface barriers in nanoporous materials.
The applications of nanoporous crystalline materials are closely related to the mass transfer of guest molecules. However, the fundamental knowledge of mass transfer, and in particular the surface barriers controlled by the permeation of guest molecules through the external surfaces of materials, is still incomplete. The diversity of surface permeability at the single-crystal level, caused by the varying origins of surface transport resistance, hinders the rational materials design and needs better understanding. Herein, we probe the molecular transport in single zeolite crystals with fluorescent 4-(4-diethylaminostyryl-1-methylpyridinium iodide) (DAMPI) using super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM). It showed that both the inter- and intra-crystal diversity of surface barriers could be monitored by detecting the diffusion behaviors on the center and surface planes in single crystals. This adds a new perspective for studying the origins of the surface barriers as well as the molecular transport mechanisms in nanoporous materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据