4.1 Review

Cholestatic pruritus: a knowledge update

期刊

ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 332-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2021.06.007

关键词

Cholestasis; Dermatology; Pruritus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on updating knowledge about cholestatic pruritus, including its clinical-epidemiological characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and evidence-based therapeutic recommendations. It emphasizes the importance for dermatologists to have knowledge about cholestatic pruritus, as they are usually the first physicians to be approached by patients experiencing this symptom. Understanding the pathophysiology of hepatic pruritus can help identify new therapeutic targets and optimize treatment approaches.
This review is focused on updating knowledge about cholestatic pruritus. It summarizes clinical-epidemiological characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and evidence-based therapeutic recommendations regarding this form of pruritus. Pruritus is a frequent symptom that accompanies several liver diseases, particularly cholestatic ones. The symptom may be mild and tolerable, but it can also dramatically reduce the quality of life. Although the exact pathophysiology of this form of pruritus remains unclear, current evidence supports a mixed origin. It is extremely important for dermatologists to have knowledge about cholestatic pruritus since they are usually the first physicians to be sought by the patient when they experience the symptom. In the absence of specific dermatological alterations, cholestasis must always be considered as a possible cause of pruritus. In addition to allowing an adequate diagnosis, a better pathophysiological understanding of hepatic pruritus provides the identification of new therapeutic targets and, consequently, optimization of the approach in patients with this condition. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据