4.5 Article

Enhancement of the electrochemical properties with the effect of alkali metal systems on PEO/PVdF-HFP complex polymer electrolytes

期刊

IONICS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 827-839

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-015-1618-5

关键词

Alkali metal salts; Complexed electrolytes; Amorphicity; Activation energy; Ion hopping mechanism

资金

  1. UGC-BSR, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer blend electrolytes based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) (PVdF-HFP) were prepared by using different lithium salts LiX (X = ClO4, BF4, CF3SO3, and N [CF3SO2](2)) using solution casting technique. To confirm the structure and complexation of the electrolyte films, the prepared electrolytes were subjected to X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. Alternating current (AC) impedance analysis was performed for all the electrolyte samples at various temperatures from 303 to 343 K. The result suggests that among the various lithium salts, LiN[CF3SO2](2)-based electrolytes exhibited the highest ionic conductivity at 8.20 x 10(-4) S/cm. The linear variation of the ionic conductivity of the polymer electrolytes with increasing temperature suggests the Arrhenius-type thermally activated process. Activation energies were found to decrease when doping with lithium imide salt. The dielectric behavior has been analyzed using dielectric permittivity (epsilon*), electric modulus (M*), and dissipation factor (tan delta) of the samples. Cyclic voltammetry has been performed for the electrolyte films to study their cyclability and reversibility. Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA) was used to ascertain the thermal stability of the electrolytes, and the porous nature of the electrolytes was identified using scanning electron microscopy via ion hopping conduction. Surface morphology of the sample having maximum conductivity was studied by an atomic force microscope (AFM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据