Priority Topics for the Community Preventive Services Task Force, 2020-2025: A Data-Driven, Partner- Informed Approach

Introduction: The Community Preventive Services Task Force periodically engages in a process to identify priority topics to guide their work. This article described the process and results for selecting priority topics to guide the work of the Community Preventive Services Task Force for the period 2020-2025. Methods: The Community Preventive Services Task Force started with Healthy People 2020 topics. They solicited input on topics from partner organizations and the public. The Community Preventive Services Task Force considered information on 8 criteria for each topic. They conducted preliminary voting and applied a priori decision rules regarding the voting results. The Community Preventive Services Task Force then engaged in facilitated deliberations and took a final vote. This process occurred October 2019-June 2020. Results: From Healthy People 2020, a total of 37 topics were selected as the starting point. The initial voting and decision rules resulted in 3 topics being determined as priorities. Community Preventive Services Task Force members considered data and information on the criteria to inform their deliberations on an additional 7 topics. A total of 9 topics were selected as the set of priorities for 2020-2025. Conclusions: Having a process that is routine and data-driven ensures that the selection of priorities is sound. By reviewing priority topics every 5 years, the Community Preventive Services Task Force will continue to provide relevant recommendations on community preventive services to improve the nation's health. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Automated summary

This article describes the process and results of selecting priority topics to guide the work of the Community Preventive Services Task Force from 2020 to 2025. The task force started with Healthy People 2020 topics, solicited input from partner organizations and the public, and considered 8 criteria for each topic. After voting and applying decision rules, a total of 9 topics were selected as priorities.