4.6 Article

Optical genome mapping for structural variation analysis in hematologic malignancies

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 97, 期 7, 页码 975-982

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26587

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a rapidly adopted technology in clinical genetics laboratories that can detect structural variation and replace multiple standard techniques, simplifying the lab workflow. OGM has superior ability in detecting structural variation across the genome, reducing the need for reflex studies and decreasing cost and turnaround time. Compared to karyotyping or fluorescence in situ hybridization, OGM can detect more abnormalities.
Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a technology that is rapidly being adopted in clinical genetics laboratories for its ability to detect structural variation (e.g., translocations, inversions, deletions, duplications, etc.) and replace several concurrent standard of care techniques (karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and chromosomal microarray). OGM can dramatically simplify lab workflow by reducing multiple tests (conventional karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], and chromosomal microarray) into one test. The superior ability to detect structural variation across the genome removes the need for reflex FISH studies, which can dramatically reduce cost and turnaround time per sample. Parallel studies of OGM versus standard of care testing have demonstrated it can detect and resolve more abnormalities than karyotyping or FISH. However, like many molecular tests that normalize copy number it can have difficulty with non-diploid karyotypes. This Test of the Month review will summarize how the technique works, review the strengths and weaknesses of OGM compared to standard of care techniques and illustrate how the technique is likely to change front line testing in many hematologic malignancies-including summarizing the clinical utility in acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据