4.1 Article

PTPRO activates TLR4/NF-κB signaling to intensify lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia cell injury

期刊

ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 119-124

出版社

CODON PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.15586/aei.v50i3.589

关键词

PTPRO; apoptosis; inflammation; lipopolysaccharide; HFL1; TLR4/NF-kappa B; pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PTPRO plays a pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic role in pneumonia through the TLR4/NF-kappa B signaling pathway.
Background: Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (PTPRO) belongs to the PTP (protein tyrosine phosphatase) family and is widely expressed in parenchymal cells, such as breast and lung epithelial cells. PTPRO has been shown to enhance inflammatory responses and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammation-associated diseases. The rote of PTPRO in pneumonia was investigated. Methods: Human embryonic lung fibroblasts (HFL1) were treated with increasing concentrations of lipopolysaccharide at 5, 10, or 20 mu g/mL to induce inflammatory and apoptotic inju- ries. Expression of PTPRO was detected by western blot. Inflammation and apoptosis were assessed by ELISA and flow cytometry assays, respectively. Results: lipopolysaccharide induced decreased cell viability, and increased inflammation and apoptosis in HFL1. PTPRO was upregulated in HFL1 post lipopolysaccharide treatment, and silencing of PTPRO enhanced lipopolysaccharide-induced cell viability of HFL1, and suppressed the inflammation and apoptosis. However, overexpression of PTPRO aggravated lipopolysaccharide-induced cytotoxicity in HFL1. Overexpression of PTPRO upregulated protein expression of TLR4 and p-p65 in lipopolysaccharide-induced HFL1, while knockdown of PTPRO reduced the level of p-I kappa B alpha to downregulate levels of TLR4 and p-p65. Conclusion: PTPRO contributed to pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic effects on lipopolysaccharide-induced HFL1 through activation of TLR4/NF-kappa B signaling. (C) 2022 Codon Publications. Published by Codon Publications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据