4.6 Article

Simultaneous mixed-integer dynamic scheduling of processes and their energy systems

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 68, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17741

关键词

demand response; integration of scheduling and control; mixed-integer dynamic optimization; mixed-integer linear programming; simultaneous scheduling

资金

  1. Helmholtz Association
  2. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing volatility of electricity prices highlights the importance of simultaneous scheduling optimization for production processes and their energy systems. In this study, we propose an efficient scheduling formulation that takes into account both process dynamics and binary on/off-decisions in the energy system. By considering three different aspects, we demonstrate the feasibility of achieving fast optimization for real-time scheduling.
Increasingly volatile electricity prices make simultaneous scheduling optimization desirable for production processes and their energy systems. Simultaneous scheduling needs to account for both process dynamics and binary on/off-decisions in the energy system leading to challenging mixed-integer dynamic optimization problems. We propose an efficient scheduling formulation consisting of three parts: a linear scale-bridging model for the closed-loop process output dynamics, a data-driven model for the process energy demand, and a mixed-integer linear model for the energy system. Process dynamics is discretized by collocation yielding a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation. We apply the scheduling method to three case studies: a multiproduct reactor, a single-product reactor, and a single-product distillation column, demonstrating the applicability to multiple input multiple output processes. For the first two case studies, we can compare our approach to nonlinear optimization and capture 82% and 95% of the improvement. The MILP formulation achieves optimization runtimes sufficiently fast for real-time scheduling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据