4.6 Article

Prediction of infinite-dilution activity coefficients with neural collaborative filtering

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17789

关键词

infinite dilution activity coefficient; machine learning; matrix completion; neural collaborative filtering; solvent screening

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978096, 21861132019]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1412600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate prediction of infinite dilution activity coefficient (gamma(infinity)) is crucial for phase equilibria and process design. This study proposes a new method based on neural collaborative filtering (NCF) to fill in the gamma(infinity) matrix, and the experimental results show that it outperforms traditional models and previous machine learning models. The completed matrix can also be used for solvent screening and parameter extension.
Accurate prediction of infinite dilution activity coefficient (gamma(infinity)) for phase equilibria and process design is crucial. In this work, an experimental gamma(infinity) dataset containing 295 solutes and 407 solvents (21,048 points) is obtained through data integrating, cleaning, and filtering. The dataset is arranged as a sparse matrix with solutes and solvents as columns and rows, respectively. Neural collaborative filtering (NCF), a modern matrix completion technique based on deep learning, is proposed to fully fill in the gamma(infinity) matrix. Ten-fold cross-validation is performed on the collected dataset to test the effectiveness of the proposed NCF, proving that NCF outperforms the state-of-the-art physical model and previous machine learning model. The completed gamma(infinity) matrix makes solvent screening and extension of UNIFAC parameters possible. Taking two typical hard-to-separate systems (benzene/cyclohexane and methyl cyclopentane/n-hexane mixtures) as examples, the NCF-developed database provides high-throughput screening for separation systems in terms of solvent selectivity and capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据