4.7 Article

Grain yield and leaf gas exchange in upland NERICA rice under repeated cycles of water deficit at reproductive growth stage

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107507

关键词

Drought; Leaf relative water content; New Rice for Africa; Stomatal conductance; Upland ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that under repeated cycles of water deficit at reproductive stage, drought-tolerant rice varieties NERICA 4 and 7 exhibited higher relative water content, stomatal conductance, and leaf photosynthetic rates compared to the drought-susceptible variety IR 64. Additionally, NERICA 4 and 7 also had significantly higher grain yield than IR 64.
New Rice for Africa (NERICA) was reported to have higher exudation and transpiration rates, above ground dry matter at heading than Japanese cultivars. Information on the expression of their gas exchange attributes and water balance under repeated cycles of water deficit at reproductive stage is unknown. This investigation tested the hypothesis that variation in leaf gas exchange and energy attributes of NERICA rice under repeated cycles of water deficit at reproductive stage would affect their performance under field conditions. Repeated cycles of water regimes (irrigation and water deficit) at reproductive stage were imposed on eight NERICA rice (NERICA 1-8) and checks (CG14, WAB56-104 and IR64). Water regimes were assigned to main plots and rice cultivars to sub-plots using randomised complete block design with three replicates. Drought-tolerant NERICA 4 and 7 had significantly higher relative water content, stomatal conductance, leaf photosynthetic rates with the least canopy temperature than others. A converse pattern was observed in the drought-susceptible IR 64. Grain yield of NERICA 4 and 7 was significantly higher than that of IR 64. These results suggested that improved water and energy status observed in NERICA 4 and 7 could have been responsible for its better performance than IR 64.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据