期刊
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103424
关键词
Agroecology; Transdisciplinarity; Epistemology; Human-nature relationship; Organic; Spirituality
资金
- Association Biodynamie Recherche
Biodynamic farming is increasing in popularity among farmers and consumers, but it is still considered pseudo science by some in the scientific community. However, pragmatic scientific approaches are compatible with biodynamic farming and have the potential for sustainability. Studies show that beliefs and spirituality in biodynamic farming contribute to a unique relationship of care between farmers and nature. While still rare, holistic multicriteria assessment studies suggest fairly satisfactory overall sustainability performances at farm scale. Additionally, biodynamic farming has proven useful in transdisciplinary action research projects, producing original actionable knowledge for sustainability.
Biodynamic farming is increasingly popular among farmers and consumers, but it is still dismissed as pseudo science by part of the scientific community. In this article, we first present an overview of biodynamic farming, its current development, foundations and three specific principles: 1) the farm seen as a living organism; 2) Preparations; 3) Cosmic rhythms. Then, we show that pragmatic scientific approaches are compatible with biodynamic farming, and suggest an interesting potential for sustainability. Particularly, anthropological studies demonstrate that beliefs and spirituality in biodynamic farming contribute to a unique relationship of care between farmers and nature. Contrary to a common misconception, biodynamic farmers are shown to be open to scientific knowledge, which they manage to combine creatively with experiential and spiritual knowledge. At farm scale, although still rare, holistic multicriteria assessment studies suggest fairly satisfactory overall sustainability performances. Biodynamic farming has also already proven to be useful in transdisciplinary action research projects with diverse stakeholders, to produce original actionable knowledge for sustainability. Overall, we conclude that biodynamic farming can be a valuable resource for reenchanting agriculture, in a comparable and complementary way to indigenous knowledge. However, it must not be seen as a panacea, and its organization and the major role of beliefs especially raise legitimate concerns. More research is needed to better understand the specific advantages and difficulties of biodynamic farming. Three key research perspec-tives are identified: 1) Farmers' decision-making; 2) Farming system design and evaluation; 3) Transformation pathways.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据