4.7 Editorial Material

Healthcare for older people in Central and South America COMMENT

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac017

关键词

health services; Latin America; geriatrics; ageism; older people

资金

  1. Secretaria de Educacion, Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion dela Ciudad de Mexico [SECITI/041/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Latin American countries face challenges in defining and understanding their culturally diverse region. The fragmented health systems, combined with a rapidly ageing population and increasing demands for care, contribute to the unpreparedness of health systems and the burden of disease. This article analyzes the burden of disease and identifies priorities to improve care and quality of life in the region.
Latin American countries (LAC), with their culturally and ethnically diverse populations, form a region that is difficult to define and to understand. The region's health systems are deeply fragmented, which poses great challenges to overall equity levels in health. This is also one of the fastest ageing regions in the world, with increasing demands as well for acute and long-term care (LTC). Demographic and epidemiological transitions across the region are heterogeneous. In this context, health systems are in general, largely unprepared to face the challenge of promoting healthy ageing. This unpreparedness has been magnified by the Coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. Here, we analyse the burden of disease in the older population and identify priorities to improve the care and quality of life for people living in LAC. Besides an adequately prepared workforce, we must remediate disparities and inequities; develop and implement integrated care; achieve patient-centred care and further develop palliative and end-of-life care; simultaneously, we must develop the structure and financing of LTC services and strengthen the role of public health making healthy ageing an essential component.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据