4.8 Article

Water/Ionic Liquid/Succinonitrile Hybrid Electrolytes for Aqueous Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202112138

关键词

batteries; ionic liquids; MD simulations; water-in-salt electrolytes

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [206021_150638/1]
  2. Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR), a Department of Energy, Energy Innovation Hub [W911NF-19-2-0046]
  3. ETH-Bereich Forschungsanstalten

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water-in-salt concept has improved the stability of aqueous electrolytes, and the addition of succinonitrile as a cosolvent opens up a large design space for optimizing the properties of electrolytes. This allows for the development of high-performance, nonflammable batteries.
The water-in-salt concept has significantly improved the electrochemical stability of aqueous electrolytes, and the hybridization with organic solvents or ionic liquids has further enhanced their reductive stability, enabling cell chemistries with up to 150 Wh kg(-1) of active material. Here, a large design space is opened by introducing succinonitrile as a cosolvent in water/ionic liquid/succinonitrile hybrid electrolytes (WISHEs). By means of succinonitrile addition, the solubility limits can be fully circumvented, and the properties of the electrolytes can be optimized for various metrics such as highest electrochemical stability, maximum conductivity, or lowest cost. While excessive nitrile fractions render the mixtures flammable, careful selection of component ratios yields highly performant, nonflammable electrolytes that enable stable cycling of Li4Ti5O12-LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 full cells over a wide temperature range with strong rate performance, facilitated by the fast conformational dynamics of succinonitrile. The WISHEs allow stable cycling with a maximum energy density of approximate to 140 Wh kg(-1) of active material, Coulombic efficiencies of close to 99.5% at 1C, and a capacity retention of 53% at 10C relative to 1C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据