4.5 Review

Cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions for delirium: A systematic literature review of economic evaluations

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 147, 期 5, 页码 430-459

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.13457

关键词

cost-effectiveness; delirium; economic evaluation; intervention; quality of evidence; review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the economic evidence of interventions for reducing, preventing, and treating delirium. The findings suggest that there is limited and varied evidence on the costs and outcomes of delirium interventions, with some interventions potentially leading to cost savings. However, more research is needed to fully understand the economic value of these interventions.
Objective Little is known about the economic value of clinical interventions for delirium. This review aims to synthesise and appraise available economic evidence, including resource use, costs, and cost-effectiveness of interventions for reducing, preventing, and treating delirium. Methods Systematic review of published and grey literature on full and partial economic evaluations. Study quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Results Fourteen economic evaluations (43% full, 57% partial) across nine multicomponent and nonpharmacological intervention types met inclusion criteria. The intervention costs ranged between US$386 and $553 per person in inpatient settings. Multicomponent delirium prevention intervention and the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) reported statistically significant cost savings or cost offsets somewhere else in the health system. Cost savings related to inpatient, outpatient, and out-of-pocket costs ranged between $194 and $6022 per person. The average CHEERS score was 74% (+/- SD 10%). Conclusion Evidence on a joint distribution of costs and outcomes of delirium interventions was limited, varied and of generally low quality. Directed expansion of health economics towards the evaluation of delirium care is necessary to ensure effective implementation that meets patients' needs and is cost-effective in achieving similar or better outcomes for the same or lower cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据