4.8 Article

Hierarchical Nanocapsules of Cu-Doped MoS2@H-Substituted Graphdiyne for Magnesium Storage

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 3955-3964

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c09405

关键词

dual-template; hydrogen-substituted graphdiyne; nanocapsule; multiple geometries; rechargeable magnesium battery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22005246]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [D5000210606]
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical nanocapsules containing Cu-doped MoS2 nanopetals enclosed in carbonaceous nanotubes have been developed for rechargeable magnesium batteries. These nanocapsules exhibit excellent energy storage performance and efficient electron/ion transfer channels.
Hierarchical nanocomposites, which integrate electroactive materials into carbonaceous species, are significant in addressing the structural stability and electrical conductivity of electrode materials in post-lithium-ion batteries. Herein, a hierarchical nanocapsule that encapsulates Cu-doped MoS2(Cu-MoS2) nanopetals with inner added skeletons in an organic-carbon-rich nanotube of hydrogen-substituted graphdiyne (HsGDY) has been developed for rechargeable magnesium batteries (RMB). Notably, both the incorporation of Cu in MoS2 and the generation of the inner added nanoboxes are developed from a dual-template of Cu-cysteine@HsGDY hybrid nanowire; the synthesis involves two morphology/composition evolutions by CuS@HsGDY intermediates both taking place sequentially in one continuous process. These Cu-doped MoS2 nanopetals with stress-release skeletons provide abundant active sites for Mg2+ storage. The microporous HsGDY enveloped with an extended pi-conjugation system offers more effective electron and ion transfer channels. These advantages work together to make this nanocapsule an effective cathode material for RMB with a large reversible capacity and superior rate and cycling performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据