4.6 Article

Inhibiting C-4 Methyl Sterol Oxidase with Novel Diazaborines to Target Fungal Plant Pathogens

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1343-1350

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00257

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mitacs Accelerate Fellowship [IT13564]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant [FDN- 154288]
  3. Boragen Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing resistance to current agricultural fungicides, there is a need for new antifungals that target unexploited pathways. A novel series of diazaborines with potent activity against fungal plant pathogens has been identified. The mode of action was determined to be through targeting the Erg25 enzyme, which is involved in ergosterol biosynthesis in fungi. The diazaborines showed promising efficacy in models of soybean-rust and grape-rot fungal diseases.
With resistance to current agricultural fungicides rising, a great need has emerged for new antifungals with unexploited targets. In response, we report a novel series of diazaborines with potent activity against representative fungal plant pathogens. To identify their mode of action, we selected for resistant isolates using the model fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Whole-genome sequencing of independent diazaborine-resistant lineages identified a recurring mutation in ERG2S, which encodes a C-4 methyl sterol oxidase required for ergosterol biosynthesis in fungi. Haploinsufficiency and allele-swap experiments provided additional genetic evidence for Erg25 as the most biologically relevant target of our diazaborines. Confirming Erg25 as putative target, sterol profiling of compound-treated yeast revealed marked accumulation of the Erg25 substrate, 4,4-dimethylzymosterol and depletion of both its immediate product, zymosterol, as well as ergosterol. Encouraged by these mechanistic insights, the potential utility of targeting Erg25 with a diazaborine was demonstrated in soybean-rust and grape-rot models of fungal plant disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据