4.5 Article

Predicting the Impact of Disruptions to Urban Rail Transit Systems

期刊

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3517015

关键词

Railway disruption; impact prediction; vulnerability; data scarcity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past decade, service disruptions of rail transit systems in urban cities have become more frequent due to various reasons such as power failures and signal errors. Smart transit cards provide detailed tapping records that enable the deduction of commuters' trajectories under normal and disruptive circumstances. This article studies and predicts the impact of disruptions on commuters and evaluates the vulnerability of the rail system.
Service disruptions of rail transit systems have become more frequent in the past decade in urban cities, due to various reasons, such as power failures, signal errors, and so on. Smart transit cards provide detailed tapping records of commuters, which enable us to infer their trajectories under both normal and disruptive circumstances. In this article, we study and predict the impact of disruptions on commuters and further evaluate the vulnerability of the rail system. Specifically, we define two metrics, stay ratio and travel delay, to quantify the impact, and we derive the predictor of eachmetric based on the inferred alternative route choices of commuters under disruptive circumstances. We demonstrate that the alternative route choices contribute to more similar feature distribution among different disruptions, which is crucial to tackling the main challenge of abnormal data scarcity and is beneficial for obtaining more reliable predictors for future disruptions. We evaluate our approach with a real-world transit card dataset. The result demonstrates the effectiveness of our method. Based on the predictors, we further analyse the vulnerability of the rail system. An evaluation with cross validation from taxi GPS trajectory data indicates its efficacy in discovering vulnerable rail stations as well as Origin-Destination pairs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据