4.6 Article

Using Four Hypothesis Probability Estimators for CABAC in Versatile Video Coding

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3531015

关键词

VVC; CABAC; entropy coding; probability estimator; adaptation rate; video compression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the key technologies involved in four hypothetical probability estimators for Context-based Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC). The focus is on the selected adaptation rate performed in these estimators, which are selected based on coding efficiency and memory considerations, and also the relationship with the current size of the coding block. The proposed scheme can linearly realize the quantitative representation of probabilistic prediction and describes the scalability potential for higher accuracy. Besides a description of the design concept, this work also discusses motivation and implementation aspects, which are based on simple operations such as bitwise operations and single subsampling for subinterval updates. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed CABAC method specified in Versatile Video Coding (VVC).
This article introduces the key technologies involved in four hypothetical probability estimators for Context-based Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC). The focus is on the selected adaptation rate performed in these estimators, which are selected based on coding efficiency and memory considerations, and also the relationship with the current size of the coding block. The proposed scheme can linearly realize the quantitative representation of probabilistic prediction and describes the scalability potential for higher accuracy. Besides a description of the design concept, this work also discusses motivation and implementation aspects, which are based on simple operations such as bitwise operations and single subsampling for subinterval updates. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed CABAC method specified in Versatile Video Coding (VVC).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据