期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 229-241出版社
CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF13178
关键词
WFDS
类别
资金
- USFS Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory [12-JV-11261987-102]
- Colorado State University [12-JV-11261987-102]
- Joint Fire Science Project [14-1-01-18]
Simulating an advancing fire front may be achieved within a Lagrangian or Eulerian framework. In the former, independently moving markers are connected to form a fire front, whereas in the latter, values representing the moving front are calculated at points within a fixed grid. Despite a mathematical equivalence between the two methods, it is not clear that both will produce the same results when implemented numerically. Here, we describe simulations of fire spread created using a level set Eulerian approach (as implemented in the wildland-urban interface fire dynamics simulator, WFDS) and a marker method (as implemented in FARSITE). Simulations of surface fire spread, in two different fuels and over domains of increasing topographical complexity, are compared to evaluate the difference in outcomes between the two models. The differences between the results of the two models are minor, especially compared with the uncertainties inherent in the modelling of fire spread.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据