4.2 Article

Canola rotation frequency impacts canola yield and associated pest species

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 9-20

出版社

AGRICULTURAL INST CANADA
DOI: 10.4141/CJPS-2014-289

关键词

Blackleg; Delia spp.; direct seeding; Leptosphaeria maculans; no-till; oilseed rape; root maggots; rotational diversity; weed populations

资金

  1. Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP)
  2. Prairie Canola Agronomic Research Program (PCARP)
  3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canola Cluster Initiative
  4. Alberta Canola Producers Commission
  5. Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission
  6. Manitoba Canola Growers Association
  7. Canola Council of Canada
  8. Western Grains Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Canola (Brassica napus L.) production has been steadily increasing in western Canada. Here we determine the effect of canola rotation frequency on canola seed yield, quality and associated pest species. From 2008 to 2013, direct-seeded experiments involving continuous canola and all rotation phases of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and canola or field pea (Pisum sativum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and canola were conducted at five western Canada locations. Fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides were applied as required for optimal production of all crops. Canola rotation frequency did not influence canola oil or protein concentration or the level of major (composition > 1%) seed oil fatty acids. High canola yields were associated with sites that experienced cooler temperatures with adequate and relatively uniform precipitation events. For each annual increase in the number of crops between canola, canola yield increased from 0.20 to 0.36 Mg ha(-1). Although total weed density was not strongly associated with canola yield, decreased blackleg disease and root maggot damage were associated with greater canola yields as rotational diversity increased. Long-term sustainable canola production will increase with cropping system diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据