4.3 Review

Genetic Code Expansion Tools to Study Lysine Acylation

期刊

ADVANCED BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202100926

关键词

chromatin; cytoskeleton; genetic code expansion; lysine acylation; metabolism

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) [RPG0031/2017]
  2. Behrens-Weise Foundation
  3. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [LA2984-5/1, 389564084, LA2984-6/1, 449703098]
  4. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lysine acylation is a widespread protein modification that influences protein function, but the majority of acylation sites are not yet characterized. Semi-synthetic methods and genetic code expansion techniques can aid in studying these modifications and discovering their potential applications in various fields.
Lysine acylation is a ubiquitous protein modification that controls various aspects of protein function, such as the activity, localization, and stability of enzymes. Mass spectrometric identification of lysine acylations has witnessed tremendous improvements in sensitivity over the last decade, facilitating the discovery of thousands of lysine acylation sites in proteins involved in all essential cellular functions across organisms of all domains of life. However, the vast majority of currently known acylation sites are of unknown function. Semi-synthetic methods for installing lysine derivatives are ideally suited for in vitro experiments, while genetic code expansion (GCE) allows the installation and study of such lysine modifications, especially their dynamic properties, in vivo. An overview of the current state of the art is provided, and its potential is illustrated with case studies from recent literature. These include the application of engineered enzymes and GCE to install lysine modifications or photoactivatable crosslinker amino acids. Their use in the context of central metabolism, bacterial and viral pathogenicity, the cytoskeleton and chromatin dynamics, is investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据