4.4 Article

Cardiorespiratory Kinetics Determined by Pseudo-Random Binary Sequences - Comparisons between Walking and Cycling

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 14, 页码 1110-1116

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-114702

关键词

circulatory model; cycle ergometry; treadmill ergometry; heart rate kinetics; oxygen uptake kinetics

资金

  1. DLR (Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt), Germany [FKZ 50WB1426]
  2. Olympic-Training-Center Rheinland, Cologne, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

his study aims to compare cardiorespiratory kinetics as a response to a standardised work rate protocol with pseudo-random binary sequences between cycling and walking in young healthy subjects. Muscular and pulmonary oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2)) kinetics as well as heart rate kinetics were expected to be similar for walking and cycling. Cardiac data and (V) over dotO(2) of 23 healthy young subjects were measured in response to pseudo-random binary sequences. Kinetics were assessed applying time series analysis. Higher maxima of cross-correlation functions between work rate and the respective parameter indicate faster kinetics responses. Muscular (V) over dotO(2) kinetics were estimated from heart rate and pulmonary (V) over dotO(2) using a circulatory model. Muscular (walking vs. cycling [ mean +/- SD in arbitrary units]: 0.40 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.08) and pulmonary (V) over dotO(2) kinetics (0.35 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.35 +/- 0.06) were not different, although the time courses of the cross-correlation functions of pulmonary (V) over dotO(2) showed unexpected biphasic responses. Heart rate kinetics (0.50 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.14; P = 0.017) was faster for walking. Regarding the biphasic cross-correlation functions of pulmonary (V) over dotO(2) during walking, the assessment of muscular (V) over dotO(2) kinetics via pseudo-random binary sequences requires a circulatory model to account for cardio-dynamic distortions. Faster heart rate kinetics for walking should be considered by comparing results from cycle and treadmill ergometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据