4.6 Article

Two-Level Attention Model of Representation Learning for Fraud Detection

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSS.2021.3074175

关键词

Attention mechanisms; deep learning; fraud detection; representation learning

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB2100801]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [22120190198]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article proposes a novel method combining two modules to learn hidden information at different levels of data for fraud detection, achieving effective results in experiments.
Fraud detection has attracted significant attention in financial institutions, especially utilizing some artificial intelligent methods to automatically detect fraudulent transactions. With the study and application of intelligent fraud detection technology, scholars found that the representation learning method can reveal more information about fraud patterns, which is also crucial for detection task. Therefore, in this work, we present a novel method for detecting fraud transactions by combining two modules learning hidden information at different levels of data in a unified framework. To address and explore the deep representation of features of transaction behaviors, we propose a two-level attention model to capture them by integrating two data embeddings at the data sample level and the feature level. In particular, the sample-level attention model captures the detailed information more centrally that is difficult to determine; the feature-level attention model extends the information of feature dependences. We further combine them to train a final fraud detection model. Extensive experiments are conducted using a data set provided by a financial company in China and several public financial data sets. The results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed method in detecting fraudulent transactions compared with other state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据