4.1 Article

Epoxy resins and composites from epoxidized linseed oil copolymers with cyclohexene oxide

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102269

关键词

Epoxy resins; Linseed oil; Copolymers; Cyclohexene oxide

资金

  1. Checkerspot, Inc.
  2. Kansas Polymer Research Center, Pittsburg State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new material was developed by copolymerizing epoxidized linseed oil (ELO) and cyclohexene oxide (CHO) catalyzed by tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF). The resulting copolymers exhibited high strength, transparency, and glass-like properties, making them suitable for various applications including optical materials and matrix resins in composites.
New materials were made by copolymerization of epoxidized linseed oil (ELO) and cyclohexene oxide (CHO) catalyzed by tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF). Pure polymerized ELO and polymerized CHO were prepared to study reactivity and properties of starting components in the presence of the selected catalyst. The catalyst furnished high conversion of CHO at a very high rate. Properties of epoxy resins are improved by increasing the amount of CHO. The copolymerization in bulk is fast at room temperature with increasing CHO content, turning violent even at low catalyst loadings, hence, the amount of CHO is limited to about 10% to allow for manageable pot life and heat management. Post-curing is required for improving mechanical properties. The materials are hard, transparent, clear glasses, with glass transitions around 45 degrees C. Tensile strengths of 27 MPa and flexural moduli over 1 GPa were observed. The feasibility of using these highly hydrophobic triglyceride-based epoxy resins in glass-reinforced composites and foams was demonstrated successfully. Potential applications for these novel systems are in optical materials, potting, encapsulating, and casting resins, foams and as matrix resins in composites. The preparation involves a simple mixing process and an inexpensive epoxidized vegetable oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据