3.8 Review

RSV: perspectives to strengthen the need for protection in all infants

期刊

EMERGING THEMES IN EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12982-021-00104-5

关键词

Global childhood disease burden; Infant and child health; Infant mortality; RSV; Respiratory syncytial virus; RSV-ALRI; RSV-associated acute lower respiratory illness; Vaccine

资金

  1. Sanofi Pasteur
  2. AstraZeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of serious illness in young children worldwide, leading to significant burden on healthcare systems. While effective preventative options for all infants are currently lacking, new prophylactic options such as monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccinations are on the horizon. A multi-stakeholder approach is crucial to bridge data gaps and fully utilize upcoming prevention strategies.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-the most common viral cause of bronchiolitis-is a significant cause of serious illness among young children between the ages of 0-5 years and is especially concerning in the first year of life. Globally, RSV is a common cause of childhood acute lower respiratory illness (ALRI) and a major cause of hospital admissions in young children and infants and represents a substantial burden for health-care systems. This burden is strongly felt as there are currently no effective preventative options that are available for all infants. However, a renaissance in RSV prevention strategies is unfolding, with several new prophylactic options such as monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccinations that are soon to be available. A key concern is that health decision makers and systems may not be ready to take full advantage of forthcoming technological innovations. A multi-stakeholder approach is necessary to bridge data gaps to fully utilise upcoming options. Knowledge must be made available at multiple levels to ensure that parents and doctors are aware of preventative options, but also to ensure that stakeholders and policymakers are given the necessary information to best advise implementation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据