4.6 Article

Environmental efficiency and energy consumption of highway transportation systems in China

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.030

关键词

Highway transportation systems; Environmental efficiency; Energy consumption; Air pollution

资金

  1. Major Projects in Philosophy and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education of China [14JZD031]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0595]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71171001, 71471001]
  4. Key Projects in Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui, China [AHSKZ2014D01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid development of the Chinese economy and urbanization process, an increasingly large urban transport system has led to increasingly serious resource and environmental problems in China. We combined the super-efficiency slack-based measure model, including undesirable outputs, with the window data envelopment analysis model, which managed panel data, to calculate the environmental efficiencies of highway transportation systems in regions of China. This measured the level of sustainable development in China's highway transportation systems. Furthermore, we calculated the consumption redundancy of gasoline and diesel, and the excess emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. We analyzed the correlativity among environmental efficiency, nitrogen oxide efficiency, and particulate matter efficiency to research the state of energy consumption and atmospheric pollution on the highway transportation systems in China. The results showed that the overall level of environmental efficiency of highway transportation systems in China was not optimal, with great differences between regions. Most regions had problems with excessive energy consumption and motor vehicle pollution. The Chinese government needs to control both energy consumption and pollutant emissions to manage the environmental problem of atmospheric pollution. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据