4.6 Article

Planning for shortages? Net Present Value analysis for a deteriorating item with partial backlogging

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.021

关键词

Net Present Value; Deteriorating inventory; Finite production rate; Shortages

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops inventory models to help answer strategic questions concerning whether planning for shortages offers financial benefits. A production-inventory system producing a deteriorating product in batches at a finite production rate with partial backordering is considered. Customers pay a deposit when placing a backorder. Backordered items receive a discount on the sales price. As lost sales may lead to customers not returning, the demand rate may depend on the fraction of lost sales. We develop a cash flow based profit maximising Net Present Value (NPV) model without the inventory cost parameters commonly used in this context: unit holding cost, unit backorder cost, unit deterioration cost, and unit lost sales cost. The model finds the optimal inventory policy just like NPV models that discount the traditional parameters but has the advantage of not needing to estimate the value of the traditional parameters. It is shown that in models based on discounting the traditional parameters, the parameters are not exogenously determinable but are non-trivial functions of non-financial endogenous system parameters such as the production rate, annual demand rate, and backorder rate. Extensive numerical experiments illustrate how cash-flow NPV models provide insights into the value of planning for shortages and strategic choices about the design of the production-inventory system. It also provides insight into the classical problem of how to interpret unit backorder cost and unit lost sales cost. The study indicates that these insights cannot be reliably obtained from NPV models based on discounting unit backorder costs and unit lost sales costs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据