4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on a novel medium Mn steel combining transformation-induced plasticity and twinning-induced plasticity effects

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 173-186

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.11.004

关键词

Phase transformation; Twinning; TRIP; TWIP; Metallic material

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. BaoSteel Group Co. Ltd [U1460203]
  3. International Science &Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFG51950]
  4. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [HKU719712E, HKU712713E, 17203014]
  5. National Science Foundation of China [51301148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The additional deep cryogenic treatment process prior to intercritical annealing was employed to tailor the mechanical stability of austenite grains in a new medium Mn steel. As a consequence, the medium Mn steel after intercritical annealing contains the austenite grains with different mechanical stability due to the different grain size and C content. The large austenite grains with low C content transform to martensite prior to the strain of 9.5% due to their low mechanical stability and provide the transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) effect during tensile test. On the other hand, the small austenite grains with high C content have high mechanical stability and proper stacking fault energy, therefore do not transform to martensite but offer the twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) effect from 9.5% strain up to fracture. Subsequently some of the twinned austenite grains provide the nucleation site for martensite formation from the strain of 26.2% up to fracture, providing the TRIP effect again in the large strain regime. In summary, the present novel medium Mn steel has TRIP effect firstly, followed by TWIP effect and then TWIP + TRIP effects during tensile test, therefore demonstrating enhanced work hardening behavior and excellent tensile properties. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据