4.7 Article

Application of a colorimetric technique in quality control for printed pediatric orodispersible drug delivery systems containing propranolol hydrochloride

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 511, 期 1, 页码 606-618

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.032

关键词

Pediatric drug delivery; Inkjet printing; Personalized medicine; Orodispersible formulations; Colorimetry; CIELAB

资金

  1. Finnish cultural foundation
  2. Doctoral Education Network in Material Research (DNMR) from Abo Akademi University (AAU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of a colorimetric technique was investigated in CIELAB color space as an analytical quality control method for content uniformity of printed orodispersible pediatric delivery systems. Inkjet printing was utilized to fabricate orodispersibe film formulations containing propranolol hydrochloride in a colored ink base using three different edible substrates. A thin sweetener coating layer of saccharin was successfully included in the final dosage forms for palatability purposes using a casting knife. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and scanning white light interferometry analyses were conducted to study the effect of printing on the surface morphology and topography of the substrates. Differential scanning calorimetry and attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy were used to study the solid state properties and possible interactions between the drug and the excipients. The inkjet printing technique deposited precise and uniform escalating doses (0.08-3.16 mg) of the active pharmaceutical ingredient onto the substrates (R-2 >= 0.9934). A disintegration test with clear end-point detection confirmed that all the substrates meet the requirements of the Ph. Eur. to disintegrate within 180s. The colorimetric technique proved to be a reliable method to distinguish the small color differences between formulations containing an escalating dose of propranolol hydrochloride. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据