4.7 Article

Microencapsulation of rifampicin for the prevention of endophthalmitis: In vitro release studies and antibacterial assessment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 505, 期 1-2, 页码 262-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.026

关键词

Rifampicin; Microparticles; Intraocular delivery; PLGA; Sustained delivery; Endophthalmitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rifampicin encapsulated microparticles were designed for intraocular injection after cataract surgery to prevent postoperative endophthalmitis. Microparticles were formulated by emulsification diffusion method using poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) as polymer in order to propose a new form of rifampicin that overcome its limitations in intraocular delivery. Depending on processing formulation, different types of microparticles were prepared, characterized and evaluated by in vitro release studies. Two types of microparticles were selected to get a burst release of rifampicin, to reach minimal inhibitory concentrations to inhibit 90% of Staphylococcus epidermidis mainly involved in postoperative endophthalmitis, combined with a sustained release to maintain rifampicin concentration over 24 h. The antibacterial activity and antiadhesive property on intraocular lenses were evaluated on S. epidermidis. Microparticles, with a rapid rifampicin release profile, showed an effect towards bacteria development similar to free rifampicin over 48 h. However, slow-release profile microparticles exhibited a similar antibacterial effect during the first 24 h, and were able to destroy all the S epidermidis in the medium after 30 h. The association of the two formulations allowed obtaining interesting antibacterial profile. Moreover, rifampicin-loaded microparticles have shown a very efficient anti-adherent effect of S. epidermidis on intraocular lenses at 24 h. These results propose rifampicin microparticles as suitable for antibioprophylaxis of the postoperative endophthalmitis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据