4.4 Article

Wildfire as a key determinant of peatland microtopography

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 8, 页码 1132-1136

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0028

关键词

self-organized patterning; succession; diversity; carbon; ecosystem resilience

类别

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB-0212333]
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STAR Fellowship Program
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microtopography is a common attribute of wetlands, particularly boreal bog and fen peatlands. This self-organized patterning is primarily an autogenic process; however, the role of allogenic forces such as disturbance in the maintenance of microtopography is poorly understood. In this study, we quantify the effect of fire on the distribution of the microtopographic gradient in boreal bogs using a before-after wildfire natural experiment. We also quantify the change in spatial abundance of microforms in boreal treed peatlands over a 100-year successional chronosequence. Wildfire nearly doubled the range of the microtopographic gradient, increasing the relative abundance of low-elevation microforms (hollows), although the distribution of elevations was influenced by peatland ontogeny at the time of wildfire. Through succession, raised microforms (hummocks) became more abundant, presumably due to autogenic surface drying facilitating hummock species expansion into adjacent hollows. Although autogenic processes may be responsible for the development of self-organized spatial patterning in wetlands, disturbances such as wildfire are necessary for maintaining boreal peatland microtopography over extended time scales. Because of the tight linkage between microtopography, species diversity, and ecosystem function, these feedbacks between wildfire and microtopography are critical for understanding peatland dynamics and the potential impact of a changing environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据