4.6 Article

regulation of the RhoA/ROCK/AKT/β-catenin pathway by arginine-specific ADP-ribosytransferases 1 promotes migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colon carcinoma

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 646-656

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3539

关键词

Arginine-specific ADP-ribosytransferases 1; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; RhoA; beta-catenin; colon carcinoma; invasion; metastasis

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20105503110009]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJ110322]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 30870946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arginine-specific ADP-ribosytransferases 1 (ART1) is able to modify the arginine of specific proteins by mono-ADP-ribosylation. We previously reported that the expression of ART1 in human colon adenocarcinoma tissues was higher than in adjacent tissues. Herein, we primarily revealed that ART1 could regulate the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and, therefore, the development of colon carcinoma. In CT26 cells, which overexpressed ART1 by lentiviral transfection, the following were promoted: alterations of spindle-like non-polarization, expression of EMT inducers and mesenchymal markers, migration, invasion and adhesion. However, epithelial marker expression was decreased. Correspondingly, knockdown of ART1 in CT26 cells had the opposite effects. The effect of ART1 on EMT and carcinoma metastasis was also verified in a liver metastasis model of BALB/c mice. To further explore the molecular mechanism of ART1 in EMT, CT26 cells were treated with several specific inhibitors and gene silencing. Our data suggest that ART1 could regulate EMT by regulating the RhoA/ROCK1/AKT/beta-catenin pathway and its downstream factors (snaill, vimentin, N-cadherin and E-cadherin) and that it therefore plays an important role in the progression of colon carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据