4.2 Article

Dose-response of intrathecal morphine when administered with intravenous ketorolac for post-cesarean analgesia: a two-center, prospective, randomized, blinded trial

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.08.003

关键词

Cesarean delivery; Analgesia; Morphine; Intrathecal; Ketorolac

资金

  1. George Washington University
  2. Columbia University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The appropriate dose of intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia is unclear. With the inclusion of routine non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the required dose of morphine may be significantly less than the 200-300 ug common a decade ago. We performed a two-center, prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing three doses of intrathecal morphine, combined with routine intravenous ketorolac, in 144 healthy women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Methods: Patients received an intrathecal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg, fentanyl 15 mu g and a randomized dose of 50, 100, or 150 mu g morphine in a volume of 2.2 mL. Patients received intravenous ketorolac 30 mg before leaving the operating room and 15 mg intravenously every 6 h for the duration of the study (24 h). All received postoperative patient-controlled intravenous morphine. The primary endpoint was total intravenous morphine administered postoperatively over 24 h, analyzed using mixed model regression. Results: There were no differences between dose groups (or institutions) in intravenous morphine use over 24 h. Visual analog scale scores for pain and nausea did not differ. Pruritus was greater in the 100 and 150 mu g groups than the 50 mu g group at 6 h and 12 h, but there was no difference between groups in nausea or pruritus treatments. Respiratory depression or significant sedation did not occur. Conclusion: The dose response relationship of intrathecal morphine for multimodal post-cesarean analgesia suggests that 50 mu g produces analgesia similar to that produced by either 100 mu g or 150 mu g. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据