3.9 Article

Experimental study on the behaviour of granular column-treated soft clay under shear loading

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17486025.2021.2015977

关键词

Granular column; soft clay; direct shear test; aggregates density; ground improvement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aims to investigate the behavior of granular column-reinforced soft soil under shear stress. Large-scale direct shear tests were performed, revealing that the use of granular column improves the shear resistance of the composite ground, especially at lower undrained shear strength of the soft clay. Additionally, the use of highly compacted column results in a decreased shear displacement, providing indirect evidence of stiffness improvement of the composite ground.
Compacted granular columns are frequently used to mitigate construction difficulties over soft soil deposits through a combination of densification, increasing load-bearing capacity and improvement in consolidation features. The behaviour of granular columns under vertical loading has been well recognised; however, this research is aimed to investigate the behaviour of granular column-reinforced soft soil subjected to shear stress. In this contribution, large-scale direct shear tests were performed, and the influence of undrained shear strength of clay, diameter of granular column and relative density of aggregates was examined. In general, the use of granular column has been shown to improve the shear resistance of the composite ground, which was found to be much significant at lower undrained shear strength of the soft clay. Increasing density of aggregates from D-r = 50% to 90% caused a large portion of the shear stress to be sustained by the accumulated friction of aggregates as the internal friction angle of the treated clay increased from 0 to 28 degrees. In addition, test results revealed that the use of highly compacted column yields a lowered shear displacement at failure, which was indirect evidence of stiffness improvement of the composite ground.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据