3.8 Article

ECG and Pacing Criteria for Differentiating Conduction System Pacing from Myocardial Pacing

期刊

ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 172-180

出版社

RADCLIFFE CARDIOLOGY
DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.26

关键词

His bundle pacing; left bundle branch pacing; left bundle area pacing; deep septal pacing; conduction system pacing; ECG; capture criteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is crucial to differentiate between His-Purkinje system capture and myocardial-only capture during pacing, as they result in different depolarisation patterns in the left ventricle. Various methods such as differential output pacing and programmed stimulation can be used to diagnose HPS capture based on differences in conduction velocities and thresholds.
During His-Purkinje conduction system (HPS) pacing, it is crucial to confirm capture of the His bundle or left bundle branch versus myocardialonly capture. For this, several methods and criteria for differentiation between non-selective (ns) capture - capture of the HPS and the adjacent myocardium - and myocardial-only capture were developed. HPS capture results in faster and more homogenous depolarisation of the left ventricle than right ventricular septal (RVS) myocardial-only capture. Specifically, the depolarisation of the left ventricle (LV) does not require slow cell-to-cell spread of activation from the right side to the left side of the interventricular septum but begins simultaneously with QRS onset as in native depolarisation. These phenomena greatly influence QRS complex morphology and form the basis of electrocardiographic differentiation between HPS and myocardial paced QRS. Moreover, the HPS and the working myocardium are different tissues within the heart muscle that vary not only in conduction velocities but also in refractoriness and capture thresholds. These last two differences can be exploited for the diagnosis of HPS capture using dynamic pacing manoeuvres, namely differential output pacing, programmed stimulation and burst pacing. This review summarises current knowledge of this subject.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据