4.3 Article

Online data sharing with virtual social interactions favor scientific and educational successes in a biodiversity citizen science project

期刊

JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2021.2019970

关键词

Citizen science; conservation science; public engagement; environmental commitment; science learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying an online communication space, we found that participants in citizen science projects share data and play various roles in this space, such as helping identify species, monitoring scientific research, and maintaining community life, which promotes exchanges and reflections on biodiversity. The existence of this space helps produce high-quality data, science learning, individual commitment to environmental issues, and enables citizens to build and strengthen collective epistemic and affective relationships with science.
Given the diversity of biodiversity citizen science projects' design and objectives, a major challenge is to better understand the factors influencing their successes. We study an online communication space where participants to a participative biodiversity monitoring program share their data and freely interact. A quantitative analysis of the comments' distribution among participants reveals the multiplicity of epistemic and social roles they endorse: helping collective identification of plants and insects, moderating the respect of the scientific protocol, or maintaining community's life. By building a typology of these comments, we show how this space of discussion favors exchanges and reflections about esthetical, interpersonal, biological and methodological aspects. We argue that the existence of such spaces favors all together the production of high-quality data, science learning, and individual commitment towards environmental issues. Maybe more importantly, they allow citizens to build and strengthen collective epistemic and affective relationships with science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据