3.8 Article

How responsive is Nigeria's cassava seed system to farmers' demand? Exploring supply and demand interactions in three farming communities

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 816-841

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2021.2018749

关键词

Cassava; demand-orientation; Nigeria; seed system; planting material

资金

  1. NWO
  2. CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB)
  3. CGIAR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the investigation and research on the cassava seed system and farmers' demand in Nigeria, this study found that the national agriculture development program alone cannot meet farmers' demand for desired seed varieties, and seed exchange between farmers and informal seed sellers plays an important role. The study also revealed variations in the presence of seed sellers and farmers' demand for cassava seed across different study sites, farmer types, and gender.
Based on a concept for demand-orientation in seed systems, we characterized Nigeria's cassava (Manihot esculenta) seed system from national to local level and farmers' demand in three study sites. Interviews with seed-system actors explained their roles for supply-side functions. Focus group discussions and a survey described multiple aspects of farmers' demand. Our findings show that the national agriculture development program alone did not have the capacity to supply farmers with sufficient seed of desired varieties. Seed exchange between farmers and informal seed sellers contributed to the distribution of seed and new varieties. The presence of seed sellers and farmers' demand for cassava seed varied between the three study sites, farmer types and gender. We conclude that informal seed sellers and village seed entrepreneurs have a potential to respond to farmers' heterogeneous demands. However, without recurrent demand for specialized seed production or continuous support from the formal system, they do not reach underserved markets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据