4.7 Article

Working conditions in essential occupations and the role of migrants

期刊

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 250-261

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.02.002

关键词

Essential occupations; Essential workers; Key workers; Migrant workers; Working conditions; Job quality; Language skills; Resilience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the working conditions in essential occupations in Germany during the Covid-19 pandemic. It identifies clusters of jobs with favorable or average working conditions, as well as clusters with unfavorable conditions, particularly for migrants. The study finds that lack of proficiency in the host-country language is the main barrier to improving migrants' working conditions.
Following a national lockdown in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, state governments in Germany published lists of essential'' occupations that were considered necessary to maintain basic services such as health care, social care, food production and transport. This paper examines working conditions in these essential occupations and identifies clusters of similar jobs. Differences across clusters are highlighted using detailed data on job characteristics including working conditions, tasks and educational requirements. Two clusters with favourable or average working conditions account for more than three-quarters of jobs in essential occupations. Another two clusters, comprising 20% of jobs in essential occupations, are associated with unfavourable working conditions such as low pay, job insecurity, poor prospects for advancement and low autonomy. These latter clusters exhibit high shares of migrants. An Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition is used to investigate which individual characteristics explain why migrants are more likely to have unfavourable working conditions. The results suggest that lacking proficiency in the host-country language is the main barrier to improving migrants' working conditions. (C) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据