4.7 Article

Dynamic imaging of allogeneic adipose-derived regenerative cells transplanted in ischemic hind limb of apolipoprotein E mouse model

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 61-71

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S118328

关键词

allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells; cell tracking; APTS nanoparticles; hind limb ischemia; ApoE knockout mouse

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81370423, 81570432, 81601621, 81670440]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [134119a2100, 20124Y132]
  3. Shanghai Sailing Program [15YF1406900]
  4. Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine Doctoral Innovation foundation [BXJ201428]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transplantation of allogeneic adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) is a promising treatment modality for severe ischemic diseases. However, minimal information is available on the in vivo effects, fate, and migration of ADRCs, as well as the mechanisms of their therapeutic angiogenesis. Materials and methods: In this study, green fluorescent protein-expressing ADRCs (GFPADRCs) were obtained, labeled with acetylated 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTS)-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (APTS NPs), and injected into an old apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE-KO) mouse model with hind limb ischemia. Then, 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to dynamically trace the role of ADRCs targeting hind limb ischemia in the ApoE-KO mice model. Results: Labeled cells were visualized as large hypointense spots in ischemic muscles by serial 3.0 T MRI scans during a 4-week follow-up. The presence of labeled GFP-ADRCs was confirmed by Prussian blue staining and fluorescence microscopy on postmortem specimens. Conclusion: This study showed that allogeneic ADRCs offer great potential application for therapeutic angiogenesis in severe ischemic disease based on the efficacy and feasibility of ADRC transplantation and on the available amounts of tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据