4.1 Article

Coping with the 'double bind' through vlogging: pandemic digital citizenship of Chinese international students

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10304312.2021.2008319

关键词

Actualizing digital citizenship; Chinese international students; double bind; pandemic; vlogging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article examines how Chinese international students practice vlogging during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting their creativity in citizen journalism and counternarrative production as a way to actualize digital citizenship. The research emphasizes the importance of understanding the concerns, needs, and resilience of international students' everyday digital practices to better support this vulnerable group in uncertain times.
The article examines the vlogging practices of Chinese international students during the COVID-19 pandemic and their positive roles in coping with the double bind. By doing thematic analysis of the content of vlog videos generated by Chinese international students on both Chinese and English audio-visual platforms, we identify three overarching themes of their vlogging stories: 'everyday personal experience sharing', 'vlogger-generated citizen journalism' and 'producing counternarratives'. We argue that Chinese international students creatively practice 'actualizing digital citizenship' through dual vlogging. Their vlogging implies a strong sense of civic engagement, connectivity and empowerment, and is conducive to the self-resilience of the affected group as well as their identity and solidarity building in the crisis. Our research advocates for a shift of digital citizenship studies to recognize the flexible, individualized and loosely networked 'actualizing digital citizenship' practice. We also call attention to take the everyday digital practices of the international students seriously to understand their concerns, needs and resilience in the uncertain and difficult times in order to better support this vulnerable cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据