4.3 Article

Defining hypoxaemia from pulse oximeter measurements of oxygen saturation in well children at low altitude in Bangladesh: an observational study

期刊

BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001023

关键词

respiratory infection; pneumonia; paediatric lung disaese

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1084286, OPP1117483]
  2. GlaxoSmithKline [90063241]
  3. Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health [K01TW009988]
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1117483, OPP1084286] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A SpO(2) threshold for hypoxaemia derived from well children in Bangladesh is higher than the standard of <90%. Younger children may require a different threshold for defining hypoxaemia. Evaluating mortality risk using higher SpO(2) thresholds is an important next step.
Background WHO defines hypoxaemia, a low peripheral arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO(2)), as <90%. Although hypoxaemia is an important risk factor for mortality of children with respiratory infections, the optimal SpO(2) threshold for defining hypoxaemia is uncertain in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We derived a SpO(2) threshold for hypoxaemia from well children in Bangladesh residing at low altitude. Methods We prospectively enrolled well, children aged 3-35 months participating in a pneumococcal vaccine evaluation in Sylhet district, Bangladesh between June and August 2017. Trained health workers conducting community surveillance measured the SpO(2) of children using a Masimo Rad-5 pulse oximeter with a wrap sensor. We used standard summary statistics to evaluate the SpO(2) distribution, including whether the distribution differed by age or sex. We considered the 2.5th, 5th and 10th percentiles of SpO(2) as possible lower thresholds for hypoxaemia. Results Our primary analytical sample included 1470 children (mean age 18.6 +/- 9.5 months). Median SpO(2) was 98% (IQR 96%-99%), and the 2.5th, 5th and 10th percentile SpO(2) was 91%, 92% and 94%. No child had a SpO(2) <90%. Children 3-11 months had a lower median SpO(2) (97%) than 12-23 months (98%) and 24-35 months (98%) (p=0.039). The SpO(2) distribution did not differ by sex (p=0.959). Conclusion A SpO(2) threshold for hypoxaemia derived from the 2.5th, 5th or 10th percentile of well children is higher than <90%. If a higher threshold than <90% is adopted into LMIC care algorithms then decision-making using SpO(2) must also consider the child's clinical status to minimise misclassification of well children as hypoxaemic. Younger children in lower altitude LMICs may require a different threshold for hypoxaemia than older children. Evaluating the mortality risk of sick children using higher SpO(2) thresholds for hypoxaemia is a key next step.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据