4.3 Article

Enhancing strategic defensive positioning and performance in the outfield

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SYSTEMS
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 223-240

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-021-00367-1

关键词

Location modeling; Spatial optimization; Sports analytics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past two decades, statistics and analytics have increasingly influenced decision-making in professional and collegiate baseball, particularly in the strategic positioning of outfielders. This paper demonstrates the potential of location analytics in optimizing outfielder positioning, resulting in improved performance. By utilizing a location optimization model and analyzing collegiate ball-tracking data, the study shows that trade-off configurations of outfielders can lead to performance improvements ranging from 1 to 3%, offering a significant strategic advantage over the course of a season.
Over the past 20 years, professional and collegiate baseball has undergone a transformation, with statistics and analytics increasingly factoring into most of the decisions being made on the field. One particular example of the increased role of analytics is in the positioning of outfielders, who are tasked with tracking down balls hit to the outfield to record outs and minimize potential offensive damage. This paper explores the potential of location analytics to enhance the strategic positioning of players, enabling improved response and performance. We implement a location optimization model to analyze collegiate ball-tracking data, seeking outfielder locations that simultaneously minimize the average distance to a batted ball and maximize the weighted importance of batted ball coverage within a response standard. Trade-off outfielder configurations are compared to observed fielder positioning, finding that location models and spatial optimization can lead to performance improvements ranging from 1 to 3%, offering a significant strategic advantage over the course of a season.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据