4.1 Article

Experimental Study of Multiaxial Stress State on Creep Rupture Life and Ductility of P91 Steel

期刊

JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1991-1999

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-021-01270-z

关键词

Notched bar; Creep; Representative stress; Multiaxial stress state

资金

  1. Universiti Malaysia Pahang

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many high-temperature components initially developed based on uniaxial creep data are now subjected to multiaxial stress states due to various factors. In order to evaluate the service life of such components under multiaxial stress conditions, predicting creep rupture life is crucial. Testing on notched bars at different notch acuities has provided valuable insights into the effects of multiaxial stress on creep ductility.
Many high-temperature components developed using uniaxial creep data are now experiencing multiaxial stress states due to geometrical changes, material behavior and loading environment conditions. In order to evaluate the service life of such components under multiaxial stress conditions, it is important to predict the creep rupture life. In this work, the notched bar creep testing has been performed at 600 degrees C on the ex-service P91 material. Notched bar creep testing has been performed on blunt and medium notched bar with notch acuities, (a/R) of 1.5 and 5, respectively. The von Mises skeletal stress could be used to adequately depict the test data for uniaxial and notched bar specimens. The cavity growth model was used to determine the effect of the multiaxial state of stress on creep ductility. At high triaxiality, the Spindler and Cocks and Ashby models agree reasonably well with the test data, but the Cocks and Ashby model overpredicts at low triaxiality. Fractographical examination of the notched bar specimens reveals an intergranular ductile failure mechanism in the case of a blunt notch and a mixed mode failure appearance in the case of a medium notch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据