4.0 Article

Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer progression: a computational study

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac29f3

关键词

computational; diabetes; foot ulcers; plantar; prediction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the development and factors affecting diabetic foot ulcers, highlighting the impact of ulcer location on plantar stresses and ulcer growth. It also introduces novel formulations for predicting peak plantar stresses.
The development of foot ulcers is a common consequence of severe diabetes. Due to vascular disorders and impeded healing caused by the disease, most foot ulcers have been reported to be affected by body weight and progress with time. Also, abnormal distribution of plantar pressures has been observed to cause the formation of additional ulcers, which may collectively lead to traumatic amputations. While a study of such pathophysiology is not possible through experiments, a few computational modelling works have investigated diabetic foot ulcers. To date, ulcers with a few sizes and locations have been studied, and their effect on the plantar stresses has been quantified. In this work, we have attempted to study the effect of all possible ulcer locations on the generated plantar peak stresses and peak stress locations where additional ulcers may form. Also, the effect of ulcer location on the possible ulcer growth was investigated. A full-scale foot model was developed and a total of 52 ulcer locations were simulated separately, with standing and walking loads. The generated stresses were normalised with the foot size and statistically analysed to develop novel formulations for predicting peak plantar stresses and their locations for any known ulcer location. The results from this study are anticipated to provide important guidelines to doctors and medical practitioners for predicting foot ulcer progression in diabetic patients with existing ulcers and allow the administration of timely preventive interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据