期刊
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 56-68出版社
WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/eet.1963
关键词
analytical framework; climate governance; decision-making; multi-level governance; polycentric governance
The governance of climate mitigation and adaptation has been discussed from both polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. These perspectives are closely related but have distinct differences in some aspects, as one has evolved from empirical research within the United States and the other within the European Union. It is necessary to bring these two discourses together within the increasingly global discourse on climate governance.
Governance of climate mitigation and adaptation has been discussed within polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. Both perspectives on climate governance are intimately related but yet in some regards are distinctly different - as one perspective has evolved from empirical research within the United States and the other in the European Union. Within an increasingly global discourse on climate governance, there is a need in the literature to bring both discourses together. The findings are based on a systematic literature review of 42 climate governance papers published since 2000. This paper discusses how multi-level and polycentric climate governance perspectives converge and diverge along five dimensions. The five dimensions provide insights for applying a multi-level or polycentric governance perspective to empirical research.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据