3.8 Article

Condylar Reshape in Orthognathic Surgery: Morphovolumetric and Densitometric Analysis Based on 3D Imaging and Digital Workflow

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 501-509

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01689-3

关键词

Condylar reshape; Digital workflow; Orthognathic surgery; Bone density; Morphovolumetric analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the reshaping processes of the temporo-mandibular joint after orthognathic surgery using a digital workflow. The results show a decreased bone density in all patients. The aim of the study is to analyze the adaptative processes occurring in condylar remodelling quantitatively and qualitatively.
Background Condylar remodelling (CR) is a complex of phenomena that generates in response of the temporo-mandibular joint to forces and stress to maintain a morphological, functional and occlusal homeostasis. The most worrying aspect of the condylar reshape is the condylar resorption which implies fast loss of vertical dimension (>6% of pre-surgical value), mandibular retraction and open bite with preserved articular function. Materials and Methods Six parameters were analysed to study the condyles of twelve patients that underwent orthognathic surgery. The digital workflow was then described to make it reproducible enabling a more in-depth study of the reshaping processes that involving the condyle after a great stress like the surgery. Results The results of our study showed many statistically significant variations of the studied parameters. In all patients, it was noticed a decreased bone density (p = 0,002 per side). Objectives The aim of our study, with the aid of the contemporary 3D imaging and digital modelling and workflow technologies, is to investigate and analyse quantitatively and qualitatively the adaptative processes occurring in CR following bimaxillary repositioning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only paper that investigates the CR considering six different variables at once.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据