3.9 Article

De Novo Malignancies After Liver Transplantation: Experience of a High-Volume Center

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 1020-1027

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00749-0

关键词

De novo; Hepatic; Immunosuppression; Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver transplantation has significantly increased survival, but has also led to the development of de novo malignancies due to chronic immunosuppressive therapy. The most common de novo malignancy was found to be non-melanoma skin cancer, highlighting the importance of a strict surveillance program in the follow-up of liver transplant recipients.
Purpose Patient care, newer immunosuppressive medications, and advances in surgical technique, have resulted in significant prolongation of survival after liver transplantation in recent years. However, as life expectancy increased and the early mortality rates have decreased, different problems have evolved due to chronic immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of the present study is to evaluate patients who were transplanted and then developed de novo malignancies, in terms of the type of malignancies and the follow-up period. Methods The study was conducted on 2814 patients who received liver transplantation between 2008 and 2020 in Inonu University Liver Transplant Institute. In total, the data of 23 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Results Non-melanoma skin cancer was the most common de novo malignancy (21.7%), followed by gynecological cancers (17.3%). The interval between the time of transplantation until the development of de novo malignancy was 36 (6-75) months. The median follow-up period after the diagnoses of the de novo malignancies was 4.11 years. One, 3-, 5-year survival rates of patients after the diagnoses of de novo malignancies were 69.6%, 56.5%, and 41.9%; respectively. Conclusion Non-melanotic skin cancers were the most common de novo cancers in liver transplant recipients. A strict surveillance program is very important in the follow-up of liver transplant recipients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据