4.3 Article

Psy-Flex: A contextually sensitive measure of psychological flexibility

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 13-23

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.09.001

关键词

Psychological flexibility; Clinical; Non-clinical; Context; Psychometric; Validity

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P1_163716/1, PP00P1_190082/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P1_190082] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a context-sensitive self-report questionnaire called Psy-Flex to measure psychological flexibility in different populations. Psy-Flex differentiates clinical and non-clinical samples and predicts unique variance in well-being.
Psychological flexibility is increasingly studied in various contexts including clinical studies. The construct has been hypothesized to be a major determinant of mental health. Existing measures lack context-sensitivity (e.g, implicitly measuring it as a trait) and/or reference to a limited time frame. We developed a short self-report measure that covers all facets of the construct and is context-sensitive. Data was collected from four separate samples (n = 744), including a community (n = 346), non-clinical (n = 188), and two clinical (n = 163 in-and outpatients and n = 47 inpatients) samples from a psychiatric hospital. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed a one-factor structure with excellent reliability (Raykov's r = 0.91). Correlations with related (such as other measures of psychological flexibility and symptomatology) and unrelated constructs (such as age and sex) were all consistent with predictions. The Psy-Flex differentiated clinical and non-clinical samples and predicted unique variance in well-being. The Psy-Flex is an easily administrable questionnaire, useful in research and clinical settings. Its context-sensitive nature makes it applicable to repeated administrations aimed at capturing change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据