4.6 Article

A robust biomarker of differential correlations improves the diagnosis of cytologically indeterminate thyroid cancers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 1355-1362

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2534

关键词

biomarker; diagnostic; indeterminate; thyroid

资金

  1. Grupo de Investigacion con Enfoque Estrategico en Bioinformatica of the Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores of Monterrey, CONACyT [339770, 002087]
  2. Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores of Monterrey, Hospital San Jose de Monterrey,
  3. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules and subsequent cytological analysis is unable to determine the diagnosis in 15 to 30% of thyroid cancer cases; patients with indeterminate cytological results undergo diagnostic surgery which is potentially unnecessary. Current gene expression biomarkers based on well-determined cytology are complex and their accuracy is inconsistent across public datasets. In the present study, we identified a robust biomarker using the differences in gene expression values specifically from cytologically indeterminate thyroid tumors and a powerful multivariate search tool coupled with a nearest centroid classifier. The biomarker is based on differences in the expression of the following genes: CCND1, CLDN16, CPE, LRP1B, MAGI3, MAPK6, MATN2, MPPED2, PFKFB2, PTPRE, PYGL, SEMA3D, SERGEF, SLC4A4 and TIMP1. This 15-gene biomarker exhibited superior accuracy independently of the cytology in six datasets, including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) thyroid dataset. In addition, this biomarker exhibited differences in the correlation coefficients between benign and malignant samples that indicate its discriminatory power, and these 15 genes have been previously related to cancer in the literature. Thus, this 15-gene biomarker provides advantages in clinical practice for the effective diagnosis of thyroid cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据