4.3 Article

Understanding Loneliness in Older Adults: Reports from Experts by Experience to Reach Digital Solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK
卷 65, 期 7, 页码 728-734

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2021.2019866

关键词

Community engagement; loneliness; social support; technology; wellness

资金

  1. National Funds through Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) within the CINTESIS.RISE RD Unit [UIDB/4255/2020]
  2. Interreg Sudoe Programme under the European Regional Development Fund [SOE4/P1/E1078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reports the experience of loneliness shared by a group of community-dwelling older Portuguese adults, revealing three main themes: loneliness as a detrimental state of the soul, loneliness reinforced by features of the aging process, and loneliness building more loneliness.
Loneliness is a subjective experience escalating worldwide and affecting older adults. Digital solutions can play a major role in addressing loneliness, although its use has been facing resistance due to scarce involvement of older adults in its design. MOAI LABS is an ongoing European project that adopts a co-design process to develop digital solutions to address loneliness in older adults. This study reports the experience of loneliness shared by a group of eight community-dwelling older Portuguese adults (aged 64 to 86 years old), who are experts by experience (who feel alone). Findings were obtained from two co-creation sessions that were audio-recorded, and transcribed. The data analysis was performed involving the research team and the experts by experience. Three themes emerged: 1) loneliness as a detrimental state of the soul; 2) loneliness reinforced by features of the aging process; and 3) loneliness builds more loneliness. MOAI LABS co-design process of digital solutions will embrace these experiences and involve frontline gerontological social workers who have experience with older adults' loneliness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据