期刊
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 989-990出版社
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01318-0
关键词
Robot-assisted surgery; Flow disruptions; Systems safety
类别
This letter to the editor responds to the concept of flow disruptions in robot-assisted surgery studies, clarifying misconceptions and emphasizing the importance of understanding the clinical process from a systems perspective.
This letter to the editor provides a response to Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery. The authors provide much needed clarification on misconceptions of flow disruption studies. The evolving methodology is not aimed at creating a non-stop flow, or optimizing efficiency, but understanding the clinical process from a systems perspective.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据